Unexpected Document Type Version Mismatch

, , , ,
1

Hello everyone,

I’m using webMethods version 10.3 and facing an unusual issue.

I’m submitting a document from the designer, using the service wm.tn.doc.xml:routeXml and when I give this string as a node input:
UNA:+.?
UNB+UNOC:3+1111:14+2222:14+231027:1409+xxx++++1
UNH+0111+CONTRL:S:2:UN
UCI+P123+2222:14+1111:14+7
UNT+3+9999999999999999999
UNZ+1+xxx

TN recognizes the document and successfully process.

But when I change CONTRL:S:2:UN to CONTRL:4:2:UN, it doesn’t recognize the document. When I check the content tab, I see that the type is CONTRL as expected but the version is “42”. Do you know the reason for that and how to fix this problem?

Thank you.

2

What version of EDIFACT is being used? What is prompting the change of the subfield from S to 4? It is possible that 4 is not supported for the doc version you’re using. Is this a document you’re sending to a partner or receiving?

3

Hi Reamon,

Contrl version 2.2 is the one that we want to use but I can only choose Contrl version 2 from TN, when adding a new document type. And it accepts the documents where the first character is a letter after the “Contrl” word. That’s why I gave the example with “S” and “4”. It recognizes CONTRL:S:2 and says that the version is 2, but when I submit CONTRL:2:2, it says that document is unknown and the version is 22. If I submit CONTRL:4:2, again, it says that document is unknown and the version is 42.

And the submitted document is what we want to send to a partner.

4

You may need to import/install the EDIFACT version/release to TN that you want to use. It has been well over a decade since I’ve done EDI work but I recall that it is relatively straight-forward to make additional versions and messages available. Perhaps that is what is needed here, if the recipient is indicating they must receive that particular version of the CONTRL message.

5

Hi Reamon,

On TN, from the Document Types tab, I click on the Add Document Types button but for CONTRL, only version 2 appears. Is there another way to import an edifact version?

Many thanks in advance.

6

Do you have same fix level on both sides?

7

Hi Engin,

Yes.
Currently I’m trying to figure out if there is another way to import an edifact version. Do you have any knowledge about it?

Many thanks in advance.

8

Unfortunately, I don’t have any experience with TN. This kind of odd behaviors are usually fixed by installing latest fixes. So I thought it might related to having different versions on the environments. Since it is a very old version, I doubt you are the first person who experienced this issue for the first time. It should be fixed by now so I would install the latest fixes and check if it fixes your problem.

9

https://documentation.softwareag.com/webmethods/adapters_estandards/eStandards/EDI/EDI_9-12/9-12_webMethods_Module_for%20EDI_webhelp/#page/eeo-webhelp%2Fto-configuring_edi_module_36.html

X12 has SEF files available to add other versions to TN. I think EDIFACT has SEFs or something similar as well. SAG support may be able to provide guidance here. It will be for an entire set of messages for a version, not just select messages. Once in TN, then you can select the messages you need to handle.

Regarding @engin_arlak thought that this may be addressed via fix – may be right but I’m thinking this is doc version thing.

10

This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.