Problems with order of Pip components

patrick.kremer.17629 · October 23, 2003, 3:22pm

Hello !

We have the problem after mapping from xCBL to Rosettanet, that the order of segments of the Pip3A4PurchaseOrderRequest is wrong.
Do anybody have the same experience. Is it really important to map the fields in the right order - That would be much work now, or does anybody knows a trick ?

nageshc.17624 · January 3, 2005, 7:59pm

There is no need to map elements in the right order. You need to specify the right document name for the “documentTypeName” input parameter when invoking pub.xml:documentToXMLString.

Topic		Replies	Views
IS 4.6 / xCBL 3.5 : mapping problem webMethods , Integration-Server-and-ESB	3	4024	April 2, 2021
unexpected prefix located before the Rosettanet pip document type webMethods , Integration-Server-and-ESB , Adapters-and-E-Standards	5	2459	April 2, 2021
IS 4.6 / xCBL 3.5 : mapping problem webMethods , Integration-Server-and-ESB , Adapters-and-E-Standards	1	1579	April 2, 2021
Implementing PIP 3C3 webMethods , Integration-Server-and-ESB , Adapters-and-E-Standards	3	2848	April 2, 2021
Document Mapping problems when migrating from IS 6.1 to IS 6.5 webMethods , Integration-Server-and-ESB , Flow-and-Java-services	5	1101	April 2, 2021

Problems with order of Pip components

Related topics