I see that we have defined ASSO, DATA, WORK, SORT, CLOG and PLOG with DEVICE=8391. The documentation (Device and File Considerations) states that DEVICE=8390, 8391, 8392, and 8393 is suitable for 3390 device types, and specifies the block size and RABNs per track associated with each device. We are currently using 3390 mod 9 devices and have just been asked to clone this system using 3390 mod 27 disk packs. Should we continue to define these with DEVICE=8391?
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| usage of 3390 model ?? dasd | 2 | 21576 | April 2, 2021 | |
| Moving from 3390-3 to 3390-9 | 11 | 13502 | April 2, 2021 | |
| Adabas usgae of 3390 type DASD | 2 | 15420 | April 2, 2021 | |
| MIXING ONE DATA DSN WITH MOD-3 AND ANOTHER WITH MOD-9 | 3 | 1070 | April 2, 2021 | |
| What is the best practice to Raw Device? | 3 | 5756 | April 2, 2021 |