Gurus,
Our Current EDI implementation ( running for god only knows ) is getting a face lift with rosettanet . Please help me to understand new jargons
What is the equivalent of 997 in RNet world
Since we are starting fresh should we implement RNIF 2.0 or RNIF 1.1 …( if you have time pls do justify )
In our Current TN setup Conversation Manager is disabled due to various reasons ….do we have to enable Conversation Manager to implement rosettanet?
Thx in Advance
Bob
Bob,
Here are my thoughts for your queries,
EDI 997 FA addresses both for EDI document failures,Success.
Similarly regarding handling of failures in rosettanet world we can use PIP OA1(NotificationOfFailure),when ever any problem occurs with any PIP transaction for example PIP 3A4 (RequestPurchaseOrder) etc…
RNIF2.0 will be the better option since it is the current version and supports what ever latest rosettanet PIPS releases.
yes,we need to enable the TN ConversationManager in order to do Rosettanet Conversations while implementing RNO’s.
HTH,
rmg,
One more
What is used as Transmission Ack …any specific PIP Record…
When we do Http(s) post trading partner response should match some dtd or schema …
thx
Bob
Actually it depends on PIP say for PIP 3A4 MG1((RequestPurchaseOrder) there is PIP 3A4 MG2(PurchaseOrderConfirmation)like Acception/Rejection of Order.
check this site for browsing different RN PIP messages,
http://rosettanet.org and look for section Standards/PIP Directory
can you please elaborate more on this question.
Hope this helps,
RMG,
Since its a http(s) transmission
can we get a sync response(xml) from client ?
Something like -
pub.web:recordToDocument ( Question is any std PIP record exists for Transmission Ack )
pub.flow:setResponse
I believe this pub.flow:setResponse scenario is not possible when dealing with Rosettanet transactions.Since Rosettanet flow will end up with sender/receiver conversations and we have to handle all requests/responses which i have mentioned above like for 3A4.
HTH,