Are you not satisfied with Coherence default clustering?..Do you have terracotta licensing?
Just curious:
HTH,
RMG
Are you not satisfied with Coherence default clustering?..Do you have terracotta licensing?
Just curious:
HTH,
RMG
coherence is not supported on VM I believe, one of the reasons SAG support recommended Terracotta; yes we do have license for Terracotta for IS clustering.
Regards
Deepan
Got u…Thanks for the update:
-update for the issue with http requests–
customer was sending XML as URL encoded which was not recognised by 82 IS, customer agreed to change in their side to remove the url encoding and test went ok.
other way we could resolve this is write a custom content handling service, extract the xml string from contentStream then decode the url encoding to get the xml string.
Strange, that same request was accepted in 65 but not in 82, may be we missed some server settings or parameters??
Nope…but they shouldn’t be changing simple/standard stuff:
Nope…but they shouldn’t be changing simple/standard stuff:
What URL encoding?
I have no chance to look at how customer is sending data. however this is my observation
I wish nothing changed in the standard stuff; still wondering any settings or other parameters causing this.
Make sure they set the content-type=text/xml while sending HTTP post string data…If not ask for more details on their methods:
As far I know no standard settings changed the receiving style: