It is not that I did not read the docs (it may seems that way), but we are doing something different from a “Regular” flow that WM wants us. We want to continue to use the java program using the BrokerJavaAPI existed since version 4.X, so we will be pub/sub req/reply to/from Broker directly, and broker talks to IS and to db, not through IS first and have IS talk to Broker. Thus maybe the confusion.
I have tested it around and it seems if going through with the above flow, a reply pulbished by IS will not go to the Broker if the reply Document was created in IS and pushed to Broker, and if a Docuemnt is directly put into the Broker (using the old tool), then the reply will go to the Broker and then of course to the java app connected to the Broker
As always, you comments are well taken and greatly appreciated.